(c) 6 分 · 内容加语言连贯的英文段落，写三到四个完整的技巧环，同时把内容点覆盖到。不要用 ① ② ③ 分条。
(c) 的一个技巧环 = 三件事
① 点名技巧 rhetorical question / statistics / contrast / example / parallelism / simile / high modality / definition / famous saying ② 引出原文 把对话里那句话译成英文引出来，加引号 ③ 说清效果 这个技巧在这里劝住了什么、让听众感觉到什么，扣回说话人的目的
According to the beginning of the conversation, why does Su Qing initially like using the AI drawing software?
(b)3 分
根据林哲的看法，人工智能在伦理方面带来了哪些问题？
根據林哲的看法，人工智能在倫理方面帶來了哪些問題？
According to Lin Zhe, what ethical problems does artificial intelligence bring?
(c)6 分
林哲在对话中是如何劝说苏晴要重视人工智能的伦理问题的？联系对话内容和语言特色来回答问题。
林哲在對話中是如何勸說蘇晴要重視人工智能的倫理問題的？聯繫對話內容和語言特色來回答問題。
How does Lin Zhe persuade Su Qing to take the ethical issues of artificial intelligence seriously? In your answer, refer to both the content and the language features used in the conversation.
交之前自查三件事
① (b) 两个方面都写了吗？创作那一面和隐私那一面，缺一面就丢分。
② (c) 每一处技巧都做到“名称 → 原文 → 效果”三步了吗？至少三处写透。
③ 全部用英文写了吗？这一题中文作答不给分。
Defines AI art in concrete terms as machine imitation of countless artists' works, framing the practice as derivative rather than original and grounding his ethical concern in a factual explanation.
数据 Statistics
超过七成的插画师发现，自己辛辛苦苦画的作品，未经允许就被拿去训练AI了
Cites a specific survey figure to demonstrate the scale of unauthorised use, lending credibility and making the harm feel widespread and evidence-based rather than alarmist.
反问 Rhetorical question
你难道不心疼吗？
Directly challenges Su Qing to imagine her own work being copied, personalising the issue and prompting her to empathise with wronged original creators.
对比 Contrast
以前我们担心的是钱包被偷，现在被偷走的，是我们的脸、我们的声音、我们的一举一动
Juxtaposes past and present threats to underscore how privacy risks have escalated from material theft to the theft of one's very identity, heightening the sense of urgency.
举例 Example
有人用AI换脸技术，把一位普通女孩的脸合成到虚假视频里，害得她名誉扫地
Supplies a concrete deepfake case in which an ordinary girl's reputation was destroyed, making the abstract danger vivid, relatable and emotionally compelling.
高情态 High modality
我们绝对不能视而不见
Uses absolute, forceful modal language to convey moral certainty and urgency, compelling the listener to treat the problem as one that cannot be ignored.
排比 Parallelism
技术可以创作，可以合成，可以模仿
Repeats the structure three times to build rhythm and momentum, acknowledging technology's power before pivoting to the boundary it must never cross, which sharpens his call for restraint.
引语 Famous saying
水能载舟，亦能覆舟
Invokes a well-known classical saying to lend cultural authority to his balanced view that technology can either benefit or harm, persuading through shared wisdom rather than personal opinion.
明喻 Simile
科技就像一把双刃剑
Uses the explicit comparison marker to liken technology to a double-edged sword, vividly illustrating that its value depends entirely on responsible use and reinforcing the need for ethical boundaries.
③ 参考答案，以及怎样才算写到位
(a) 1 分
Sample Su Qing initially likes the AI drawing software because it is extremely convenient and fast, letting her produce a good-looking illustration in only a few seconds.
Sample Lin Zhe believes artificial intelligence creates serious ethical problems in two main areas. In terms of creation, he argues that AI art is built by feeding the works of countless illustrators into a machine without their consent, so that over seventy percent of artists have found their pieces used to train AI, unfairly robbing original creators of their effort and dignity. In terms of privacy, he warns that people's faces, voices and everyday actions can now be stolen and misused, giving the example of a girl whose reputation was destroyed by an AI face-swap video while she had nowhere to turn for help. He concludes that AI must never cross the boundaries of respect and consent, and that clear ethical rules for the technology are urgently needed.
Sample Lin Zhe persuades Su Qing to take AI ethics seriously by building his case across three aspects, each reinforced with distinct language features. Firstly, on the ethics of AI creation, he uses definition and statistics. He defines AI art by explaining that it 'feeds the works of tens of thousands of illustrators into a machine so it can imitate and stitch them together,' and cites that 'over seventy percent of illustrators have found their work used to train AI without permission.' This factual grounding demonstrates the scale of the problem and makes his concern credible. He layers this with a rhetorical question, asking whether her heart would not ache if her own late-night work were copied, which personalises the issue and prompts her to empathise with wronged creators. Secondly, on privacy, he uses contrast and a concrete example. He contrasts past and present, noting that 'before we worried our wallets would be stolen; now what is stolen is our faces, our voices,' which underscores the escalating threat. He then supplies the example of a deepfake video that ruined an ordinary girl's reputation, and adds high-modality language, insisting 'we absolutely must not turn a blind eye,' conveying urgency and moral certainty. Finally, he calls for balance using a famous saying and a simile. He quotes 'water can carry a boat, yet also capsize it' and compares technology to 'a double-edged sword,' illustrating that its value depends on how it is used. The parallel structure 'it can create, synthesise, imitate, but it must never cross the line' urges self-restraint. Together these techniques convince Su Qing that ethical boundaries matter more than convenience, moving her from resistance to agreement.